Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpsQO9ZZ/Ex8_BLR02

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could not be shown:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fib(N)) → mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) → mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(sel(N, XS))
mark(fib(X)) → active(fib(mark(X)))
mark(sel(X1, X2)) → active(sel(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(fib1(X1, X2)) → active(fib1(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
fib(mark(X)) → fib(X)
fib(active(X)) → fib(X)
sel(mark(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, mark(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(active(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, active(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
fib1(mark(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(active(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, active(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fib(N)) → mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) → mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(sel(N, XS))
mark(fib(X)) → active(fib(mark(X)))
mark(sel(X1, X2)) → active(sel(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(fib1(X1, X2)) → active(fib1(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
fib(mark(X)) → fib(X)
fib(active(X)) → fib(X)
sel(mark(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, mark(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(active(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, active(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
fib1(mark(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(active(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, active(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ADD(active(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
MARK(fib1(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(fib(N)) → MARK(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
MARK(fib1(X1, X2)) → FIB1(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(fib(X)) → ACTIVE(fib(mark(X)))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, active(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(fib1(X, Y)) → CONS(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y)))
ACTIVE(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → MARK(sel(N, XS))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
FIB1(X1, active(X2)) → FIB1(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) → MARK(X)
FIB(active(X)) → FIB(X)
FIB1(X1, mark(X2)) → FIB1(X1, X2)
FIB1(active(X1), X2) → FIB1(X1, X2)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ADD(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(sel(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
S(active(X)) → S(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(mark(X1), X2)
FIB(mark(X)) → FIB(X)
MARK(fib(X)) → FIB(mark(X))
ACTIVE(fib(N)) → FIB1(s(0), s(0))
ACTIVE(fib1(X, Y)) → FIB1(Y, add(X, Y))
ACTIVE(fib(N)) → SEL(N, fib1(s(0), s(0)))
ACTIVE(fib(N)) → S(0)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(fib1(X, Y)) → ADD(X, Y)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
MARK(fib(X)) → MARK(X)
SEL(mark(X1), X2) → SEL(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → ADD(X, Y)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
SEL(X1, active(X2)) → SEL(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → S(add(X, Y))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
MARK(fib1(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
ADD(X1, mark(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
SEL(X1, mark(X2)) → SEL(X1, X2)
SEL(active(X1), X2) → SEL(X1, X2)
FIB1(mark(X1), X2) → FIB1(X1, X2)
MARK(s(X)) → S(mark(X))
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(fib1(X, Y)) → MARK(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
MARK(sel(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(sel(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(sel(X1, X2)) → SEL(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(fib1(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(fib1(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
ACTIVE(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → SEL(N, XS)
ACTIVE(add(0, X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(sel(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fib(N)) → mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) → mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(sel(N, XS))
mark(fib(X)) → active(fib(mark(X)))
mark(sel(X1, X2)) → active(sel(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(fib1(X1, X2)) → active(fib1(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
fib(mark(X)) → fib(X)
fib(active(X)) → fib(X)
sel(mark(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, mark(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(active(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, active(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
fib1(mark(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(active(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, active(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ADD(active(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
MARK(fib1(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(fib(N)) → MARK(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
MARK(fib1(X1, X2)) → FIB1(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(fib(X)) → ACTIVE(fib(mark(X)))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, active(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(fib1(X, Y)) → CONS(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y)))
ACTIVE(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → MARK(sel(N, XS))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
FIB1(X1, active(X2)) → FIB1(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) → MARK(X)
FIB(active(X)) → FIB(X)
FIB1(X1, mark(X2)) → FIB1(X1, X2)
FIB1(active(X1), X2) → FIB1(X1, X2)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ADD(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(sel(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
S(active(X)) → S(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(mark(X1), X2)
FIB(mark(X)) → FIB(X)
MARK(fib(X)) → FIB(mark(X))
ACTIVE(fib(N)) → FIB1(s(0), s(0))
ACTIVE(fib1(X, Y)) → FIB1(Y, add(X, Y))
ACTIVE(fib(N)) → SEL(N, fib1(s(0), s(0)))
ACTIVE(fib(N)) → S(0)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(fib1(X, Y)) → ADD(X, Y)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
MARK(fib(X)) → MARK(X)
SEL(mark(X1), X2) → SEL(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → ADD(X, Y)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
SEL(X1, active(X2)) → SEL(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → S(add(X, Y))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
MARK(fib1(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
ADD(X1, mark(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
SEL(X1, mark(X2)) → SEL(X1, X2)
SEL(active(X1), X2) → SEL(X1, X2)
FIB1(mark(X1), X2) → FIB1(X1, X2)
MARK(s(X)) → S(mark(X))
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(fib1(X, Y)) → MARK(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
MARK(sel(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(sel(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(sel(X1, X2)) → SEL(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(fib1(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(fib1(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
ACTIVE(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → SEL(N, XS)
ACTIVE(add(0, X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(sel(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fib(N)) → mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) → mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(sel(N, XS))
mark(fib(X)) → active(fib(mark(X)))
mark(sel(X1, X2)) → active(sel(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(fib1(X1, X2)) → active(fib1(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
fib(mark(X)) → fib(X)
fib(active(X)) → fib(X)
sel(mark(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, mark(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(active(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, active(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
fib1(mark(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(active(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, active(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 7 SCCs with 16 less nodes.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ADD(active(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, active(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, mark(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fib(N)) → mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) → mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(sel(N, XS))
mark(fib(X)) → active(fib(mark(X)))
mark(sel(X1, X2)) → active(sel(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(fib1(X1, X2)) → active(fib1(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
fib(mark(X)) → fib(X)
fib(active(X)) → fib(X)
sel(mark(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, mark(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(active(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, active(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
fib1(mark(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(active(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, active(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ADD(active(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, active(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, mark(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(ADD(x₁, x₂)) = (3)x_1 + (4)x_2

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 12.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fib(N)) → mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) → mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(sel(N, XS))
mark(fib(X)) → active(fib(mark(X)))
mark(sel(X1, X2)) → active(sel(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(fib1(X1, X2)) → active(fib1(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
fib(mark(X)) → fib(X)
fib(active(X)) → fib(X)
sel(mark(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, mark(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(active(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, active(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
fib1(mark(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(active(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, active(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fib(N)) → mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) → mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(sel(N, XS))
mark(fib(X)) → active(fib(mark(X)))
mark(sel(X1, X2)) → active(sel(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(fib1(X1, X2)) → active(fib1(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
fib(mark(X)) → fib(X)
fib(active(X)) → fib(X)
sel(mark(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, mark(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(active(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, active(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
fib1(mark(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(active(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, active(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 4 + (2)x_1
POL(CONS(x₁, x₂)) = (4)x_1 + (4)x_2
POL(mark(x₁)) = 4 + (2)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fib(N)) → mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) → mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(sel(N, XS))
mark(fib(X)) → active(fib(mark(X)))
mark(sel(X1, X2)) → active(sel(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(fib1(X1, X2)) → active(fib1(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
fib(mark(X)) → fib(X)
fib(active(X)) → fib(X)
sel(mark(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, mark(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(active(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, active(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
fib1(mark(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(active(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, active(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(mark(X)) → S(X)
S(active(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fib(N)) → mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) → mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(sel(N, XS))
mark(fib(X)) → active(fib(mark(X)))
mark(sel(X1, X2)) → active(sel(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(fib1(X1, X2)) → active(fib1(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
fib(mark(X)) → fib(X)
fib(active(X)) → fib(X)
sel(mark(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, mark(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(active(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, active(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
fib1(mark(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(active(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, active(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

S(mark(X)) → S(X)
S(active(X)) → S(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 4 + x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(S(x₁)) = (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fib(N)) → mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) → mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(sel(N, XS))
mark(fib(X)) → active(fib(mark(X)))
mark(sel(X1, X2)) → active(sel(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(fib1(X1, X2)) → active(fib1(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
fib(mark(X)) → fib(X)
fib(active(X)) → fib(X)
sel(mark(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, mark(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(active(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, active(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
fib1(mark(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(active(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, active(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FIB1(X1, active(X2)) → FIB1(X1, X2)
FIB1(X1, mark(X2)) → FIB1(X1, X2)
FIB1(mark(X1), X2) → FIB1(X1, X2)
FIB1(active(X1), X2) → FIB1(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fib(N)) → mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) → mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(sel(N, XS))
mark(fib(X)) → active(fib(mark(X)))
mark(sel(X1, X2)) → active(sel(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(fib1(X1, X2)) → active(fib1(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
fib(mark(X)) → fib(X)
fib(active(X)) → fib(X)
sel(mark(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, mark(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(active(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, active(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
fib1(mark(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(active(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, active(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

FIB1(X1, active(X2)) → FIB1(X1, X2)
FIB1(X1, mark(X2)) → FIB1(X1, X2)
FIB1(mark(X1), X2) → FIB1(X1, X2)
FIB1(active(X1), X2) → FIB1(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 3 + (3)x_1
POL(FIB1(x₁, x₂)) = x_1 + (4)x_2
POL(mark(x₁)) = 1 + (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fib(N)) → mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) → mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(sel(N, XS))
mark(fib(X)) → active(fib(mark(X)))
mark(sel(X1, X2)) → active(sel(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(fib1(X1, X2)) → active(fib1(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
fib(mark(X)) → fib(X)
fib(active(X)) → fib(X)
sel(mark(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, mark(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(active(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, active(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
fib1(mark(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(active(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, active(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

SEL(mark(X1), X2) → SEL(X1, X2)
SEL(X1, active(X2)) → SEL(X1, X2)
SEL(X1, mark(X2)) → SEL(X1, X2)
SEL(active(X1), X2) → SEL(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fib(N)) → mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) → mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(sel(N, XS))
mark(fib(X)) → active(fib(mark(X)))
mark(sel(X1, X2)) → active(sel(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(fib1(X1, X2)) → active(fib1(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
fib(mark(X)) → fib(X)
fib(active(X)) → fib(X)
sel(mark(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, mark(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(active(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, active(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
fib1(mark(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(active(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, active(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

SEL(mark(X1), X2) → SEL(X1, X2)
SEL(X1, active(X2)) → SEL(X1, X2)
SEL(X1, mark(X2)) → SEL(X1, X2)
SEL(active(X1), X2) → SEL(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(SEL(x₁, x₂)) = (4)x_1 + (3)x_2

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 12.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fib(N)) → mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) → mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(sel(N, XS))
mark(fib(X)) → active(fib(mark(X)))
mark(sel(X1, X2)) → active(sel(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(fib1(X1, X2)) → active(fib1(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
fib(mark(X)) → fib(X)
fib(active(X)) → fib(X)
sel(mark(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, mark(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(active(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, active(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
fib1(mark(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(active(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, active(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FIB(mark(X)) → FIB(X)
FIB(active(X)) → FIB(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fib(N)) → mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) → mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(sel(N, XS))
mark(fib(X)) → active(fib(mark(X)))
mark(sel(X1, X2)) → active(sel(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(fib1(X1, X2)) → active(fib1(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
fib(mark(X)) → fib(X)
fib(active(X)) → fib(X)
sel(mark(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, mark(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(active(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, active(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
fib1(mark(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(active(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, active(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

FIB(mark(X)) → FIB(X)
FIB(active(X)) → FIB(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 4 + x_1
POL(FIB(x₁)) = (4)x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fib(N)) → mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) → mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(sel(N, XS))
mark(fib(X)) → active(fib(mark(X)))
mark(sel(X1, X2)) → active(sel(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(fib1(X1, X2)) → active(fib1(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
fib(mark(X)) → fib(X)
fib(active(X)) → fib(X)
sel(mark(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, mark(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(active(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, active(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
fib1(mark(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(active(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, active(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(fib(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(sel(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(fib(N)) → MARK(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
MARK(fib1(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(fib(X)) → ACTIVE(fib(mark(X)))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(fib1(X, Y)) → MARK(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
MARK(fib1(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
MARK(sel(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(sel(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → MARK(sel(N, XS))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(fib1(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(fib1(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(add(0, X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(sel(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fib(N)) → mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) → mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(sel(N, XS))
mark(fib(X)) → active(fib(mark(X)))
mark(sel(X1, X2)) → active(sel(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(fib1(X1, X2)) → active(fib1(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
fib(mark(X)) → fib(X)
fib(active(X)) → fib(X)
sel(mark(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, mark(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(active(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, active(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
fib1(mark(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(active(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, active(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(fib(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(sel(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(fib(N)) → MARK(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
MARK(fib1(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(fib(X)) → ACTIVE(fib(mark(X)))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(fib1(X, Y)) → MARK(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
MARK(fib1(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
MARK(sel(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(sel(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → MARK(sel(N, XS))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(fib1(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(fib1(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(add(0, X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(sel(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(sel(x₁, x₂)) = 1
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 1
POL(add(x₁, x₂)) = 1
POL(active(x₁)) = 3
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 4
POL(fib1(x₁, x₂)) = 1
POL(fib(x₁)) = 1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 0
POL(s(x₁)) = 0
POL(0) = 0
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

fib1(X1, active(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(mark(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(active(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib(active(X)) → fib(X)
fib(mark(X)) → fib(X)
sel(X1, mark(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(mark(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, active(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(active(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(fib(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(sel(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(fib(N)) → MARK(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
MARK(fib1(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(fib(X)) → ACTIVE(fib(mark(X)))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(fib1(X, Y)) → MARK(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
MARK(fib1(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
MARK(sel(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(sel(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → MARK(sel(N, XS))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(fib1(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(fib1(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(add(0, X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(sel(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fib(N)) → mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) → mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(sel(N, XS))
mark(fib(X)) → active(fib(mark(X)))
mark(sel(X1, X2)) → active(sel(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(fib1(X1, X2)) → active(fib1(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
fib(mark(X)) → fib(X)
fib(active(X)) → fib(X)
sel(mark(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, mark(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(active(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, active(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
fib1(mark(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(active(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, active(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(fib(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(sel(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(fib(N)) → MARK(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
MARK(fib1(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(fib(X)) → ACTIVE(fib(mark(X)))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(fib1(X, Y)) → MARK(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
MARK(fib1(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
MARK(sel(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(sel(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → MARK(sel(N, XS))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(fib1(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(fib1(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(add(0, X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(sel(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(sel(x₁, x₂)) = 2
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(add(x₁, x₂)) = 2
POL(active(x₁)) = 2
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 4
POL(fib1(x₁, x₂)) = 2
POL(fib(x₁)) = 2
POL(mark(x₁)) = 0
POL(s(x₁)) = 0
POL(0) = 0
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = (2)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

fib1(X1, active(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(mark(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(active(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib(active(X)) → fib(X)
fib(mark(X)) → fib(X)
sel(X1, mark(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(mark(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, active(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(active(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(fib(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(sel(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(fib(N)) → MARK(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
MARK(fib1(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(fib(X)) → ACTIVE(fib(mark(X)))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(fib1(X, Y)) → MARK(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
MARK(fib1(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
MARK(sel(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(sel(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → MARK(sel(N, XS))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(fib1(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(fib1(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(add(0, X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(sel(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fib(N)) → mark(sel(N, fib1(s(0), s(0))))
active(fib1(X, Y)) → mark(cons(X, fib1(Y, add(X, Y))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(sel(0, cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(sel(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(sel(N, XS))
mark(fib(X)) → active(fib(mark(X)))
mark(sel(X1, X2)) → active(sel(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(fib1(X1, X2)) → active(fib1(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
fib(mark(X)) → fib(X)
fib(active(X)) → fib(X)
sel(mark(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, mark(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(active(X1), X2) → sel(X1, X2)
sel(X1, active(X2)) → sel(X1, X2)
fib1(mark(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, mark(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(active(X1), X2) → fib1(X1, X2)
fib1(X1, active(X2)) → fib1(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.